|
"It is uplifting to lose one's faith in a reality
which looks the way it is described in a newspaper." [From Die
Fackel [The Torch], periodical, Karl Kraus, Vienna:
1911-36] |
By OTTO
April 5, 2004
et's define some terms carefully and then use them to rate some
statements from a New
York Times editorial that expressed that paper's reaction to the
killing of 4 US agents in Falluja, Iraq on March 31, 2004. The following
definitions are from Webster's New World Dictionary of the American
Language, College Edition.
Stupid, adj.
- in a state of stupor; dazed; stunned; stupefied.
- lacking normal intelligence or understanding; slow-witted; dull.
- showing or resulting from a lack of normal intelligence; foolish;
irrational.
- dull and boring; tiresome
SYN.—stupid implies such lack of intelligence or
incapacity for perceiving, learning, etc. as might be shown by one in a
mental stupor; dull implies a mental sluggishness that may be
constitutional or may result from overfatigue, disease, etc.;
dense suggests thickheadedness or obtuseness (e.g., too
dense to take a hint); slow suggests that the quickness,
but not necessarily the capacity to learn is below average;
retarded implies a being behind others of the same age or class
because of mental deficiency or slowness in learning (e.g., a
retarded pupil).
With that inventory of descriptive terms at our disposal, let's take a
few sentences from the NYT's editorial [the text from the editorial is in
boldface].
- ...the emotional force of those pictures of burned Americans
hanging from a bridge in the Iraqi town of Falluja was devastating.
So far so good. He admits that he was emotionally devastated, meaning
something was destroyed: Perhaps his illusions, e.g., about the
gratitude the Iraqi people would show their American liberators?
- ...hundreds of Americans and thousands of Iraqis have been killed
in this war...
This is the standard construction of an apologist for an aggressor:
War as pestilence, an act of God or blind nature, not the planned agency
of a gang of war criminals. This puts the aggressor and his victim on
the same moral plane.
- ...the grisly deaths of these four security consultants —
ambushed, burned, mutilated, dragged through the streets — struck a deep
nerve.
A deep nerve? How about deep memory? We all took history in school.
We learned about the Civil War, Reconstruction, and lynching in the old
Confederacy. This writer's failure to make the most obvious connections
between the past and the present suggests that he is stupid,
dense, and retarded.
- ...letting those emotions shape the future of American occupation
policy in Iraq — pushing it either toward vengeful reprisals or toward a
panicky, casualty-driven withdrawal — would be a terrible mistake.
Having established his intellectual qualifications, this pretentious
moron now gets, of all things, gratuitously preachy.
- What the horrific images from Falluja should convey is that the
fundamental problem is in Iraq itself.
Not in the US? The lies justifying the war, its planning and
execution, and the legislation authorizing its funding, were all made in
the United States. Even Dubya knows this. This sentence earns its writer
a rating of stupid, dull, dense and retarded.
- ...the course this page has long championed...
What this paper championed was war. It did so by relentlessly
printing scare headlines that Iraq had chemical weapons that it was
ready to use against the United States. Here are some samples:
- FOREIGN DESK | November 1, 2001, Thursday
A
NATION CHALLENGED: BIOTERROR TREATY; U.S. SEEKS CHANGES IN GERM WAR
PACT By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | November 11, 2001, Sunday
A
NATION CHALLENGED: CHEMICAL WEAPONS; Al Qaeda Sites Point to Tests Of
Chemicals By JAMES RISEN and JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | November 19, 2001, Monday
A
NATION CHALLENGED: BIOTERROR; U.S. Publicly Accusing 5 Countries of
Violating Germ-Weapons Treaty By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | December 20, 2001, Thursday
A NATION CHALLENGED: SECRET SITES; Iraqi Tells of
Renovations at Sites For Chemical and Nuclear Arms By JUDITH
MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | April 20, 2002, Saturday
A
NATION CHALLENGED: PLOTS; Qaeda Leader In U.S. Custody Provokes
Alert By JUDITH MILLER and PHILIP SHENON
- FOREIGN DESK | May 7, 2002, Tuesday
Washington Accuses Cuba Of Germ-Warfare
Research By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | September 8, 2002, Sunday
THREATS AND RESPONSES: THE IRAQIS; U.S. SAYS HUSSEIN
INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS By MICHAEL R. GORDON and
JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | September 13, 2002, Friday
THREATS AND RESPONSES: BAGHDAD'S ARSENAL; White House
Lists Iraq Steps To Build Banned Weapons By JUDITH MILLER
and MICHAEL R. GORDON
- FOREIGN DESK | September 14, 2002, Saturday
THREATS AND RESPONSES: TERRORIST WEAPONS; Lab Suggests
Qaeda Planned To Build Arms, Officials Say By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | November 12, 2002, Tuesday
THREATS AND RESPONSES: CHEMICAL WEAPONS; IRAQ SAID TO
TRY TO BUY ANTIDOTE AGAINST NERVE GAS By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | December 3, 2002, Tuesday
THREATS AND RESPONSES: GERM WEAPONS; C.I.A. Hunts Iraq
Tie to Soviet Smallpox By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | January 24, 2003, Friday
THREATS AND RESPONSES: INTELLIGENCE; Defectors Bolster
U.S. Case Against Iraq, Officials Say By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | April 24, 2003, Thursday
AFTEREFFECTS: THE SEARCH; U.S.-Led Forces Occupy Baghdad
Complex Filled With Chemical Agents By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | May 4, 2003, Sunday
AFTEREFFECTS: SEARCH FOR WEAPONS; U.S. Experts Find
Radioactive Material in Iraq By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | May 11, 2003, Sunday
AFTEREFFECTS: THE HUNT FOR EVIDENCE; Trailer is a Mobile
Lab Capable of Turning Out Bioweapons, a Team Says By JUDITH
MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | May 12, 2003, Monday
AFTEREFFECTS: WEAPONS SLEUTHS; Radioactive Material
Found At a Test Site Near Baghdad By JUDITH MILLER
- FOREIGN DESK | May 21, 2003, Wednesday
AFTEREFFECTS: GERM WEAPONS; U.S. Analysts Link Iraq Labs
To Germ Arms By JUDITH MILLER and WILLIAM J. BROAD
This partial list of headlines over stories printed by the NYT shows
that it is as guilty as the Bush regime for the death and destruction it
ordered rained on Iraq and that besides the project of advancing US
global domination, the Times aided and abetted the Pentagon in its
craven project of using Iraq and its people as a living laboratory for
testing its latest weapons systems.
That the writer of this editorial forgot or never understood what his
own newspaper printed in the last two years earns him a rating of
retarded.
There's something else we all learned in high school: The story of
William Randolph Hearst's "yellow journalism" and how it paved the way
for America's first step on the road of imperialism, the Spanish
American War. Mistakenly, we assumed that the universal condemnation of
Hearst's provocation would prevent it from ever happening again. We were
wrong. Yellow journalism is back, or perhaps it never ended. It just got
slicker. Until this war. The sheer stupidity of the Bush crowd and its
collaborators at the New York Times in promoting a lie that would
inevitably be exposed has blown their cover.
We can also thank the heroic resistance of the Iraqi people. Had they
acquiesced in their conquest, the media hacks would have had an easy
time covering their tracks. The American people owe them a profound debt
of gratitude.
At the simple burial of Saddam Hussein's sons and his nephew, whose
deaths so overjoyed the bloodlust of the US media that they momentarily
lost control of themselves, one of the mourners told a reporter, "We
will drive you out of Iraq on your knees." For the world, that would be
the best possible outcome of this latest US aggression.
That people this egregiously stupid are allowed to express the
editorial policy of a major newspaper in a country that claims the right
to rule the world is scandalous.
|